The risk level is referred to as “qualitative” since it is a quick approximation and does not reflect the rigor of a detailed, numerical analysis. The risk level should be high, medium, or low, depending on the severity of impact and the probability of the event occurring.
There are many techniques for performing qualitative risk analysis. Three examples are shown in this section, but there are other techniques as well.
High, Medium, Low Table
Use the following table as a starting point. It helps identify high, medium and low level risks by looking at the probability of the occurrence and the overall impact to your project. For instance, a highly likely / high impact event is obviously a high risk. Likewise an event that has a low impact to your project, and has a low likelihood of occurrence anyway, is obviously a low risk. The other combinations fall somewhere within these two extremes. However, each event must be evaluated individually. If you have an event that is not likely to occur, but the impact, if it occurred, would be devastating (i.e. someone could get killed), you would still want to consider it a high risk and put together a Risk Management Plan accordingly.
| Severity of Risk Impact / Probability of Risk Occurring | Overall Risk Level |
| High negative impact to project / Highly likely to occur | High |
| High negative impact to project / Medium likely to occur | High |
| High negative impact to project / Not likely to occur | Medium/Low |
| Medium negative impact to project / Highly likely to occur | Medium |
| Medium negative impact to project / Medium likely to occur | Medium/Low |
Medium negative impact to project / Not likely to occur | Low |
| Low negative impact to project / Highly likely to occur | Low |
| Low negative impact to project / Medium likely to occur | Low |
| Low negative impact to project / Not likely to occur | Low |
High, Medium, Low Color Chart
You can also represent these nine simple risk combinations in a table as follows:
| Probability -> Impact |
Low |
Medium |
High |
| Low | Ignore | Ignore | Caution |
| Medium | Ignore | Caution | Response |
| High | Caution | Response | Response |
The green boxes represent a combination of probability and impact that you may safely be able to ignore. The red boxes represent combinations that need to be managed. The yellow boxes represent combinations that should be evaluated further individually.
Risk Probability Table
You can allow for more precision by increasing the number of options available for the probability of the risk. For instance, you could create a five-part scale for the probability of risk as follows.
| Probability | Low Impact | Medium Impact | High Impact |
| Hardly likely (<> | Low Risk | Low Risk | Low Risk |
| Not likely (<> | Low Risk | Low Risk | Medium Risk |
| Might or might not happen (35% - 65%) | Low Risk | Medium Risk | Medium / High Risk |
| Likely (>65%) | Low Risk | Medium / High Risk | High Risk |
| Highly likely (>90%) | Low Risk | Medium / High Risk | High Risk |
Instead of a simple low, medium, high impact, you can be more elaborate. For instance, you could again develop a five-part scale as follows (this scale applies to each risk):
- low (or no) impact in terms of cost and schedule
- a potential 2%-4% impact in terms of cost or schedule
- a potential 5%-7% impact to budget or schedule
- a potential 8%-10% impact to budget or schedule
- high, potential of over 10% impact to budget or schedule
After you create a scale like the one above, you would still need to determine how to analyze the information. For instance, you may decide that a scale level 1 or 2 can be ignored, while a scale level of 4 or 5 should be managed. The level 3 would represent risks that need to be evaluated individually.




0 reacties:
Post a Comment